Throughout the semester my group
covered East Asian territorial disputes, particularly those involving
the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands (China/Japan) and the Spratly and Parcel
Islands (China/Vietnam). Both of these disputes are as mired in
historical claims as they are in nationalism. China and Japan have
been snipping at each other's heels over incidents involving the
islands, such as when the Japanese government bought three of the
Senkakus from a private owner, sparking massive protests and calls to
boycott Japanese products in China. China has also drawn ire for
declaring an air defense identification zone around the East China
Sea, which includes the Senkakus and other islands in that region
that China claims are theirs. The tensions between China and Japan on
this issue are so thick that another World War is feared to be
eminent. In the South China Sea, China has repeatedly imposed
fishing bans and expelled foreign ships, especially those from
Vietnam.
We mainly used newspaper articles for
our research; the articles came from the New York Times, Los
Angeles Times, and BBC News. We also used the foreign
policy blog The Diplomat. In the first post, we used a
Congressional Research report (“Maritime Territorial Disputes in
East Asia: Issues for Congress”) that broadly covered the East
Asian territorial disputes, including each country's historical
reasoning for these claims, the islands that are under claim by
various countries, and ways to (peacefully) end the disputes. As for
creating a post, we collected a bunch of relevant articles that we
found, read them for relevancy/quality, and summarized the best ones.
For the second post, each group member wrote a paragraph on at least
two articles out of the collection. I think this approach made sure
that everyone had a hand in the research and writing process, as well
as a general idea of what was happening with our topic. Usually, our
group met every Tuesday at 5pm, either to find articles or draft up a
post.
From our topic, I learned that the
disputes mostly revolve around history- who laid claim to which
island first, who took which island from whom, how an island was
present in a country's history, etc. China also seemed to be the
common link to all the disputes, which is possibly a reflection of its
increasing military power. I also found that writing the post
together (with one person typing and the others dictating) made more
sense than each person editing and adding to the post by themselves
at home. It gave the posts a consistent tone. The same could be said
of all the parties involved in the East Asian territorial disputes,
but hopefully the tone will change from one of belligerence to one of
cooperation.
No comments:
Post a Comment